Interview featured in the Geode Newsletter
Many would agree that life has taken a sharp detour throughout the past year. The pandemic forced us into a much smaller and lonelier lifestyle, affecting our social lives in nearly every way. Driven to find some semblance of solace in this new landscape, many found a new connection with nature. Myself included. In a frenzied need to get out of the house and sooth my restlessness, I spent a lot of time outdoors in the warmer months. Going for walks, exploring landscapes, listening to the birds, reading, writing, or sketching outside was refreshing; simply taking time to soak in the beauty of the natural world was one positive thing that came out of the pandemic. Winter in Wisconsin can be brutal. Temperatures have now reached sub-zero, making it more challenging to spend time outside. Unless, of course, one isn’t afraid to brave the cold, even if it means resembling Ralphie’s kid brother in “A Christmas Story.” There are wonderful winter textures, beautiful moments of sunlight, and icy reflections created by the 12+ inches of snow in a wintry, frigid, Wisconsin landscape. I’m realizing that these moments are deserving of our attention. Covid’s negative impact on my social life has had a profound influence on my relationship to nature. For me, the current state of our situation has re-ignited the wonder of the natural world. Now, I find myself paying closer attention to the landscapes and environments that surround us daily.
For some artists, exploring the endless textures, colors, and compositions that nature provides is not a new revelation. Nature’s charming abundance is at the center of many artists’ studio practice. Artists like Kyle Seis have been exploring nature’s wonder all along, pandemic or not.
I’ve known Kyle Seis for the past 6 years and his images have stuck with me since I first saw his work in the Mary Nohl Fellowship exhibition at INOVA (Institute of Visual Arts) in Milwaukee, WI in 2015. Image making and photography is at the center of Kyle’s practice. Landscape, natural environments, and topographical textures often appear in his works through a variety of processes; including scanning, manipulating, combining, photographing, and finding images. Kyle’s images are very connected to the current moment and have felt invigorating to me, especially when I think about the pandemic’s impact on my own personal relationship to nature. Kyle reflects on his studio practice and process of making in a conversation we had at the start of the year.
RHS: How has the pandemic impacted your studio practice?
KS: I think the most notable impact has been the pause on the social side of things. There’s a lot of great energy to be found in conversations at shows/openings and in studio visits, and I certainly miss being able to feed off of those kinds of situations. I also really miss the magic of consistently experiencing works in person and finding inspiration in those moments.
RHS: How do you define your relationship to photography?
KS: My practice is 100% wrapped up in photography and images in general. I’d love to break the mold a bit and work through other mediums and processes but I think that image-making will always maintain a strong presence. I find it difficult to separate myself from the magnetism of images and the potential magic that can be held within a rectangular frame.
RHS: You use found imagery in some of your work. Can you talk about the process of finding, collecting, or selecting which images you ultimately use in your images? What goes into making those decisions?
KS: I typically source images from used books about natural science and geography that I keep in my studio. If I’m feeling stuck, I’ll often flip through the books and rip out pages that contain images that I’m interested in to keep busy and keep ideas flowing. Sometimes I’m drawn to images that might look like something that I would try to take, and other times I’m drawn in by the potential power of a small sliver within a larger image. It really depends on the situation, but ultimately the found image (or the portion that I want to use) needs to feel energetic in some way.
RHS: I know you use scanning as part of your image making process. Can you talk about how you utilize scanning as part of your process and whether or not you feel it impacts the authorship of your work?
KS: I’ve always had an interest in the perception of space within two-dimensional images, and with the scanner as an image-making apparatus I’m really intrigued by the intended flatness of the images that they generate. I keep thinking about the process as a re-flattening of the flat, and I’m trying to toy with that and pull the images apart a bit. I haven’t felt a lessened sense of authorship when working with a scanner and found images, as the process of selecting/cropping/editing a found image feels a bit similar to that of making a photograph. In addition, there’s often some level of either physical or digital manipulation happening in the images that I make.
RHS: Many of your images include natural/organic subject matter: landscapes, flora, etc. What can you say about your work’s connection to nature?
KS: I really like drawing connections between the medium of photography and the natural world through my work. There’s a lot of room to find poetic similarities between the two and I’m consistently inspired by the ways in which they overlap. For example, my body of work The Surface of a Stone is Always in Motion looked at rocks as time based surfaces that can behave like images in some ways. In other bodies of work, I’ve been influenced by the similarities between the dot patterns of printed images and grains of sand, and looked at the sky as a perplexing two-dimensional image.
RHS: Do you feel that social media has an impact on your artistic practice or process? If yes, how so?
KS: I don’t know that social media has had a direct impact on my work or process, but I enjoy being able to share little experiments that might not be seen otherwise and I love being able to keep up with other artists in the same way.
RHS: Are your images inspired by memories or stories or something else?
KS: More than anything, my work is influenced by small moments of awe. I spend a lot of time observing nature and I often leave with loose ideas/prompts for images or titles for images that are already in progress.
RHS: What artists are you looking at currently?
KS: Some current favorites are Letha Wilson, Miriam H. Nielsen, Inka & Niklas, Adam Jeppesen, and Roxana Azar.
RHS: At present, are you working on any upcoming projects or exhibitions?
KS: I am not working on anything too specific at the moment. I’m primarily looking for ways to continue experimenting with the scanner to make images, and I’m also revisiting old bits of writing for ideas to play with. Hopefully soon I’ll have some shows and/or collaborative projects fall into place!
Artist Bio:
Kyle Seis earned his BFA from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee in 2014, and has been the recipient of a Mary L. Nohl Fellowship for Individual Artists and a Mary L. Nohl Suitcase Export Fund grant. His work has been shown in galleries and institutions such as the Milwaukee Art Museum (Milwaukee, WI), INOVA (Milwaukee, WI), the Museum of Wisconsin Art (West Bend, WI), The Alice Wilds (Milwaukee, WI), Osnova Gallery (Moscow, RU) Filter Photo Space (Chicago, IL), Skylab Gallery (Columbus, OH), Neon Heater Gallery (Findlay, OH), Dateline (Denver, CO), and NOISE (Bloomington, IN). He ran Wavepool (2014-2017), a blog dedicated to interviewing artists that use photography in their practice, and co-organized Carpool (2015-2017), a series of weekend-long experimental residencies/exhibitions in Milwaukee and Chicago. In addition, he ran Chamber (2015-2017, 2019-2020), a basement gallery space in Milwaukee.